Bushansky v. Gorman et al.
| Stephen Bushansky |
| Christopher M. Gorman, Alexander M. Cutler, H. James Dallas, Elizabeth R. Gile, Ruth Ann M. Gillis, Robin N. Hayes, Carlton L. Highsmith, Richard J. Hipple, Devina A. Rankin, Barbara R. Snyder, Richard J. Tobin, Todd J. Vasos, David K. Wilson and KeyCorp |
| 1:2023cv02257 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] The Court has received and reviewed the parties' Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Consolidation of Related Actions, Appointment of Counsel, Service, and Schedule (Stipulation and Proposed Order). (Doc. No. #9 .) The Court declines to execute the Stipulation and Proposed Order given the provisions in Paragraph 10, which provide that "[t]his Order shall apply to each shareholder derivative action arising out of the same, or substantially the same, transactions or events as the Consolidated Action, which is subsequently filed in, removed to, reassigned to, or transferred to this Court." (Doc. No. 9 at p. 5.) Paragraph 10 also provides, "[u]nless otherwise ordered, the terms of all orders, rulings, and decisions in the Consolidated Action shall apply to all later substantially similar shareholder derivative actions filed in this Court, removed to this Court, reassigned to the Court, or transferred here from another court." (Id. at p. 6.) Paragraph 10 does not explain why the Court should bind the litigants and their counsel of subsequent shareholder derivative actions to the provisions of the Stipulation and Proposed Order, including but not limited to the appointment of Co-Lead Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel. Therefore, the Court will not execute the Stipulation and Proposed Order as submitted. (Doc. No. #9 .) It is so ORDERED. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/10/2024. (P,K)
|
| Filing 9 Proposed Stipulation filed by Stephen Bushansky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Weiss Law Resume, #2 Exhibit RLF Resume)(Camillus, John) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Related Cases filed by All Defendants. (Ritts, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Henry C. Hassay filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Hassay, Henry) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by KeyCorp. (Ritts, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Geoffrey J. Ritts filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Ritts, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Stephen Bushansky. Alexander M. Cutler, H. James Dallas, Elizabeth R. Gile, Ruth Ann M. Gillis, Christopher M. Gorman, Robin N. Hayes, Carlton L. Highsmith, Richard J. Hipple, KeyCorp, Devina A. Rankin, Barbara R. Snyder, Richard J. Tobin, Todd J. Vasos and David K. Wilson waivers sent on 11/27/2023, answer due 1/26/2024 filed on behalf of Stephen Bushansky (Attachments: #1 Executed Waiver-Cutler, #2 Executed Waiver-Dallas, #3 Executed Waiver-Gile, #4 Executed Waiver-Gillis, #5 Executed Waiver-Gorman, #6 Executed Waiver-Hayes, #7 Executed Waiver-Highsmith, #8 Executed Waiver-Hipple, #9 Executed Waiver-KeyCorp, #10 Executed Waiver-Rankin, #11 Executed Waiver-Snyder, #12 Executed Waiver-Tobin, #13 Executed Waiver-Vasos, #14 Executed Waiver-Wilson)(Camillus, John) Modified to list service dates on 12/20/2023 (F,AW). |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - must be filed individually. Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Stephen Bushansky. All Defendants filed on behalf of Stephen Bushansky (Attachments: #1 Exhibit executed waivers)(Camillus, John) Marked error and advised filer to re-file waivers individually on 12/12/2023 (M,CE). |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided, no summons issued. (R,AP) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (R,AP) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP) |
| Filing 1 Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid, $402.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12283260. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:23-cv-01520. Filed by Stephen Bushansky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Verification) (Camillus, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
