Eaton Corporation v. United States of America
Eaton Corporation |
United State of America and United States of America |
1:2023cv02278 |
November 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James S Gwin |
Thomas M Parker |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Affidavit of Service by certified mail unexecuted upon Internal Revenue Service on 12/6/2023, filed on behalf of Eaton Corporation Related document(s) #8 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Receipt IRS) (Hunter, Juliana) Modified link on 1/5/2024 (E,CK). Modified on 1/9/2024 to notate service considered unexecuted. Signature required. (L,Br). |
Filing 12 Affidavit of Service by certified mail executed upon US Attorney General on 12/8/2023, filed on behalf of Eaton Corporation Related document(s) #6 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Receipt US Atty General)(Hunter, Juliana) Modified on 1/5/2024 (L,Br). |
Filing 11 Affidavit of Service by certified mail executed upon US Attorney ND OHIO on 12/8/2023, filed on behalf of Eaton Corporation Related document(s) #6 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Receipt US Atty ND Ohio)(Hunter, Juliana) Modified on 1/5/2024 (L,Br). |
|
Filing 9 Joint Motion to stay case filed by Respondent United States of America. (Heston, Anderson) |
|
Filing 8 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon United States of America (Internal Revenue Service). (M,CE) |
|
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. Judge Pamela A. Barker terminated. (F,AW) |
|
|
|
|
Filing 6 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon United State of America for (U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio) and (U.S. Attorney General). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI) |
Filing 5 Motion for attorney Nadiya F. Beckwith-Stanley to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12287169, filed by Petitioner Eaton Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)(Beckwith-Stanley, Nadiya) |
Filing 4 Motion for attorney Garrett L. Brodeur to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12287167, filed by Petitioner Eaton Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)(Brodeur, Garrett) |
Filing 3 Motion for attorney Juliana D. Hunter to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12287166, filed by Petitioner Eaton Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)(Hunter, Juliana) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Eaton Corporation PLC for Eaton Corporation filed by Eaton Corporation. (Hunter, Juliana) |
Filing 1 Complaint against United State of America. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12287158. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:23-mc-00037-JG. Filed by Eaton Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 6038A Summonses, #2 Affidavit of Minghe Bai, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons - Rebecca C. Lutzko, #5 Summons - William M. Paul, #6 Summons - Merrick B. Garland). (Hunter, Juliana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.