Irvan v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Sara Irvan |
Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC |
1:2023cv02329 |
December 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Reply to #5 Response in Opposition to #4 Motion to remand to State Court filed by Sara Irvan. (Horton, Robert) |
Filing 5 Opposition to #4 Motion to remand to State Court filed by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Exhibits to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand)(Resetar, Nicholas) |
Filing 4 Motion to remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Sara Irvan. (Horton, Robert) |
Notice to Attorney Robert P. Horton. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (W,Jo) |
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 12/7/2023. (P,K) |
Order [non-document] This matter was removed to this Court on 12/7/2023. For the convenience of the Court, and by no later than 12/21/2023, the parties are directed to refile herein any motions that were previously filed in state court and which remained pending at the time of removal. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 12/7/2023. (P,K) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (H,Ch) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate Lowe's Companies, Inc. for Lowe's Home Centers, LLC filed by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. (Resetar, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, case number 23CV209704 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 405, receipt number AOHNDC-12304711. Filed by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Resetar, Nicholas) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (H,Ch) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.