Cisternino v. Social Security Administration et al.
| Anthony J. Cisternino |
| Social Security Administration and Job and Family Services |
| 1:2023cv02450 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Plaintiff Anthony J. Cisternino. (M,CE)
|
|
Filing 4
Statement of Facts filed by Anthony J. Cisternino. (M,CE)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Anthony J. Cisternino. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Cuyahoga County Probate Court Documents)(F,AW)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Anthony J. Cisternino. Related document(s) #1 . (R,AP)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Job and Family Services, Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Anthony J. Cisternino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Various Documents in Support) (R,AP)
|
|
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (R,AP)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (R,AP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
