Newell v. Chambers-Smith et al.
Timothy Newell |
Annette Chambers-Smith, Roger Wilson and Lisa Hoying |
1:2024cv00042 |
January 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Charles Esque Fleming |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Motion for enlargement of time pursuant to USCS Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. R. 6(b)(1) (30-days in which to respond to motion to dismiss) filed by Plaintiff Timothy Newell. Related document #3 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Legal Mail Log). (H,Ch) |
Filing 3 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Annette Chambers-Smith, Lisa Hoying, Roger Wilson. Related document(s) #1 . (Worly, Mindy) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued over the counter to pro se filer for service upon Annette Chambers-Smith, Lisa Hoying, Roger Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (F,AW) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Annette Chambers-Smith, Lisa Hoying, Roger Wilson. Filing fee $405.00 paid, receipt # 149533. Filed by Timothy Newell. (Attachments: #1 Appendix-State Court Criminal Case Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (F,AW) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (F,AW) |
Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.