McMillen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Diamond McMillen |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
1:2024cv00170 |
January 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Jonathan D Greenberg |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice to parties: Pursuant to General Order 2024-04, the referral to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker, whose retirement was effective on March 24, 2024, is hereby withdrawn, and the case is referred to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg re Social Security Complaint. (S,HR) |
Filing 9 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Related document(s) #1 . (Golden, Dennis) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/20/2024. (D,JJ) |
Financial Transaction in the amount of $405.00 received from Diamond McMillen. Receipt # 150292. Related document(s) #6 . (F,AW) |
Order [non-document]: In compliance with the court's January 30, 2024 order (ECF Doc. #6 ), plaintiff Diamond McMillen has paid the filing fee. Accordingly, McMillen's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #3 ) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/20/2024. (D,JJ) |
Filing 6 Order: In reviewing plaintiff Diamond McMillen's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #3 ), the court finds that a supplement is necessary to clarify McMillen's financial position. Accordingly, by February 27, 2024, McMillen shall either (i) pay the filing fee or (ii) submit a revised financial affidavit supplying the information specified in the court's order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 1/30/2024. (D,JJ) |
Filing 5 Notice of Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Diamond McMillen. Related document(s) #2 .(Margolius, Marcia) |
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi. (H,Ch) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/29/2024. (H,Ch) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (H,Ch) |
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (H,Ch) |
Filing 3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Diamond McMillen. Related document(s) #2 . (Margolius, Marcia) |
Filing 2 Amended complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filed by Diamond McMillen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Margolius, Marcia) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Diamond McMillen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Margolius, Marcia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.