Staci Corp. v. Videndum Production Solutions, Inc.
Staci Corp. doing business as Vexos |
Videndum Production Solutions, Inc. and Vitec Videocom |
1:2024cv00196 |
February 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James S Gwin |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (H,Ch) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Videndum Holdings Limited, Other Affiliate Videndum Holdings Limited for Videndum Production Solutions, Inc. filed by Videndum Production Solutions, Inc.. (Silk, Richard) |
Filing 2 Notice of Removal from Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, case number 24CV211140 Filing fee paid $ 405, receipt number AOHNDC-12386619. Filed by Videndum Production Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Silk, Richard) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Videndum Production Solutions, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12386606. Filed by Videndum Production Solutions, Inc. (Silk, Richard) |
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.