Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. R.H. Sheppard Co., Inc.
| Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
| R.H. Sheppard Co., Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00202 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons were provided, no summons were issued. (F,AW) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Parker-Hannifin Corporation. (Ware, Robert) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against R.H. Sheppard Co., Inc. Filing fee paid $405.00, receipt number AOHNDC-12388641. Filed by Parker-Hannifin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Sheppard Order Summary, #2 Exhibit 2 - Terms and Conditions of Purchase-Commercial, #3 Exhibit 3 - Adequate Assurance Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ware, Robert) |
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 2/2/2024. (P,K)
|
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. R.H. Sheppard Co., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Parker-Hannifin Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Bailes |
| Represented By: | Robert F. Ware |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R.H. Sheppard Co., Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
