Phillips v. Equifax Inc.
| Marquita Phillips |
| Equifax Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00354 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| David A Ruiz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order: Pro se plaintiff Marquita Phillips filed a civil action in this Court. She did not pay the filing fee for this action. Rather, she submitted an Application to Proceed without Prepaying Costs or Fees (Doc. No. #2 ). The short form she used, however, is an outdated form that does not provide a complete and accurate picture of her financial situation. The Court notes that Plaintiff has been previously warned about the deficiency of this outdated Application in a case previously filed in this district. See Phillips v. Santander Bank, No. 1:22-cv-01354 (N.D. Ohio filed Aug. 1, 2022) (Ruiz, J.). Plaintiff is therefore ordered to either pay the full fee of $ 405.00 or to complete and submit the accompanying Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 14 days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd on 4/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed with Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit). (D,JJ)
|
| Copy of #4 Order, mailed to Marquita Phillips at 3803 E. 147th St., Cleveland, OH 44128 on 4/4/2024. (D,JJ) |
|
Filing 3
Order of Transfer as related. This case is returned to the Clerk for reassignment to Judge David A. Ruiz for all further proceedings. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 4/3/2024. (P,K)
|
| Copy of #3 Order reassigning case mailed to Marquita Phillips 3803 E. 147th St. Cleveland, OH 44128 on 4/3/2024. (P,K) |
| Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. Judge Pamela A. Barker terminated. (H,Ch) |
| Reassignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to General Order 2024-05. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd. (S,HR) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Marquita Phillips. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681 et sq) with jury demand against Equifax Inc. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Marquita Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons). (H,Ch) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Phillips v. Equifax Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marquita Phillips | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
