NRP Contractors LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
| NRP Contractors LLC |
| Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London |
| 1:2024cv00391 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Consent Motion for leave to Plead filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Gourash, Daniel) |
Order [non-document] Defendant's Motion for Leave to Plead (Doc. No. #10 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendant to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is May 2, 2024. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 4/17/2024.(P,K)
|
| Filing 9 Consent Motion for leave to Plead filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Gourash, Daniel) |
|
Order [non-document] granting Consent Motion for Leave to Plead. (Doc #9 .) Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/21/2024.(P,K)
|
| Filing 8 Affidavit of Service by personal service upon Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London on 3/7/2024, filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Dubyak, Robert) |
| Filing 7 Supplement to #3 Motion for attorney Christopher E. Kentra to Appear Pro Hac Vice- Declaration of Christopher E. Kentra, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #3 . (Dubyak, Robert) |
| Filing 6 Supplement to #2 Motion for attorney Blake A. Roter to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Declaration of Blake A. Roter, filed by NRP Contractors LLC. Related document(s) #2 . (Dubyak, Robert) |
|
Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Blake A. Roter for NRP Contractors LLC. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #2 ). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/5/2024.(P,K)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Christopher E. Kentra for NRP Contractors LLC. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #3 ). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/5/2024.(P,K)
|
| Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (F,AW) |
| Filing 4 Supplement to Complaint,, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Dubyak, Robert) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (F,AW) |
|
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/4/2024. (P,K)
|
| Filing 3 Motion for attorney Christopher E. Kentra to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12435650, filed by Plaintiff NRP Contractors LLC. (Dubyak, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Motion for attorney Blake A. Roter to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12435639, filed by Plaintiff NRP Contractors LLC. (Dubyak, Robert) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Bad Faith with jury demand against Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. Filing fee paid $405.00, receipt number AOHNDC-12435517. Filed by NRP Contractors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Underwriters Policy, #2 Exhibit 2 - Underwriters' Reservation of Rights Letter, #3 Exhibit 3 - Underwriters' Partial Release, #4 Exhibit 4 - Underwriters' Denial Letter, #5 Exhibit 4 NRP's Response to Underwriters' Letter, #6 Summons, #7 Supplement Corporate Disclosure Statement, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dubyak, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
