Miller v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christopher Lee Miller
Defendant: Sterling Infosystems, Inc. and Does 1-10
Case Number: 1:2024cv00434
Filed: March 6, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Charles Esque Fleming
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2024 Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Christopher Lee Miller. Sterling Infosystems, Inc. waiver sent on 3/12/2024, answer due 5/13/2024 filed on behalf of Christopher Lee Miller (Fok, Devin)
March 12, 2024 Filing 3 Motion for attorney Devin H. Fok to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12453898, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Lee Miller. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Miller-Novak, Matthew)
March 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Devin H. Fok for Christopher Lee Miller. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #3 ). Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 3/12/2024. (S,SR)
March 6, 2024 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Sterling Infosystems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,AP)
March 6, 2024 Filing 1 Complaint for damages with jury demand against Sterling Infosystems, Inc. and Does 1-10. Filing fee paid, $405.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12443436. Filed by Christopher Lee Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Miller-Novak, Matthew)
March 6, 2024 Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (R,AP)
March 6, 2024 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Lee Miller
Represented By: Matthew E. Miller-Novak
Represented By: Devin H. Fok
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sterling Infosystems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?