Emrit v. Combs et al.
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records |
| 1:2024cv00441 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit. Related document(s) #1 . (F,AW) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Atlantic Records, Bad Boy Entertainment, Sean P. Diddy Combs. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (F,AW) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a complete Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the second page of the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Copy of #1 Complaint and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Ronald Satish Emrit, 6655 38th Lane, East Sarasota, FL 34243 on 3/7/2024. Related document(s) #1 . (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (F,AW) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
