Garrett v. Allen et al.
| Lisa Garrett |
| Cruz D. Allen, Trance M. Van Liere, Thomas Develin, James R. Meade, Christopher Leach, Jordan C. Haas, Brenna M. Nye, Betty Jean Greene and John Doe |
| United States of America |
| 1:2024cv00471 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| David A Ruiz |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (R,AP) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to Notice of Removal - Docket Page filed by United States of America. Related document(s) #1 . (Asher, Ruchi) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Notice of Removal - Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas Complaint filed by United States of America. Related document(s) #1 . (Asher, Ruchi) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV-23-986997. Filing fee exempt. Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subpoena, #2 Exhibit B - Denial Letter, #3 Exhibit C - Order Granting Motion to Compel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Asher, Ruchi) |
| Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (R,AP) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (R,AP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
