Shabazz v. King
| Mayor Brandon King |
| 1:2024cv00488 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Brandon King. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12460304.. Filed by Brandon King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheeet, #2 Summons Summons for King, #3 Summons Summons for Hemmons, #4 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Notice, #6 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Service, #7 Pleading Motn for Sanctions, #8 Pleading Motn for Date Change, #9 Exhibit Supplemental Civil Cover) (Hemmons, Willa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shabazz v. King | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mayor Brandon King | |
| Represented By: | Willa Hemmons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
