Kacmarcik v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Aaron Kacmarcik |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2024cv00499 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Reuben J Sheperd |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Related document(s) #1 . (Blower, David) |
| Notice to parties: Pursuant to General Order 2024-05, the referral to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg is withdrawn, and this case is reassigned and referred to Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd. (S,HR) |
| Notice to parties: Pursuant to General Order 2024-04, the referral to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker, whose retirement was effective on March 24, 2024, is hereby withdrawn, and the case is referred to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg re Social Security Complaint. (S,HR) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 3/18/2024. (D,JJ) |
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi. (F,AW) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Aaron Kacmarcik. Related document(s) #1 . (Balin, Paulette) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Aaron Kacmarcik. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Balin, Paulette) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (F,AW) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (F,AW) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (F,AW) |
|
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kacmarcik v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aaron Kacmarcik | |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Shupe |
| Represented By: | Paulette F. Balin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | SSA-Office of General Counsel |
| Represented By: | David I. Blower |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.