Noco Company v. Spontana LLC
| Noco Company |
| Spontana LLC doing business as Dr. Home Improvement |
| 1:2024cv00501 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Service by Clerk. Alias Summons and Complaint addressed to Spontana LLC d/b/a Dr. Home Improvement c/o Registered Agent placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 9589 0710 5270 1020 8893 75. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 7 Alias Summons issued to counsel for service upon Spontana LLC (c/o Registered Agent). (F,AW) |
| Filing 6 Praecipe for issuance of Alias Summons to Registered Agent of Spontana LLC filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Alias Summons)(Zulandt, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 6/20/2024 at 09:15 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Counsel are instructed to first initiate a call with all parties connected and then contact the Court. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 5/2/2024. (M,S) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Spontana LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 9589 0710 5270 1020 8896 89. (F,AW) |
| Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Noco Company. (Pinney, Jon) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Spontana LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,AP) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Noco Company. (Pinney, Jon) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Spontana LLC. Filing fee paid, $405.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12462710. Filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Reseller Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Dr. Home Improvement's Use of NOCO trademark, #3 Exhibit 3 - February 8, 2024 Cease & Desist Letter to Dr. Home Improvement, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons, #6 Summons) (Pinney, Jon) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP) |
| Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. (R,AP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Noco Company v. Spontana LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Noco Company | |
| Represented By: | Antonio F. Dempsey |
| Represented By: | Derek P. Hartman |
| Represented By: | Robert E. Zulandt, III |
| Represented By: | Jon J. Pinney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Spontana LLC doing business as Dr. Home Improvement | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
