Townsend v. Rockwell Automation Inc. et al.
Faith Townsend |
Rockwell Automation Inc., Robert Rodgriguez and Stephen Ostrom |
1:2024cv00528 |
March 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to pro se Plaintiff over the counter for service upon Stephen Ostrom, Rockwell Automation Inc., Robert Rodgriguez (x2). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (F,AW) |
Filing 1 Complaint: Fraud on the Court FRCP 60 (d)3 Perjury 18 U.S.C. 1623 against All Defendants. Filing fee $405.00 paid, receipt # 150866. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to terminated civil action 1:18-cv-02742-JG. Filed by Faith Townsend. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Pay Calculation, #2 Exhibit B-Pay Calculation, #3 Exhibit C-Pay Calculation, #4 Exhibit D-Paycheck Information, #5 Exhibit E-Paycheck Information, #6 Exhibit F2-USBank Statement, #7 Exhibit F-Income Information, #8 Exhibit H-Paycheck Information, #9 Exhibit J-Statement, #10 Exhibit 1-Notes from CMC Meeting July 30th, 2017, #11 Exhibit 2-Order from 1:18cv2742-JG, #12 Exhibit 3-Declaration of Stephen Ostrom, #13 Exhibit 4-Pacer Transaction Receipt, #14 Copy of Check, #15 Exhibit 6-Email Correspondence, #16 Exhibit 7-Email Correspondence, #17 Exhibit 8-Email Correspondence, #18 Exhibit 10-Cisco Screenshot, #19 Civil Cover Sheet, #20 Summons) (F,AW) |
Copy of Order mailed to Faith Townsend 803 East 155 Street Cleveland, OH 44110 on 3/21/2024. (P,K) |
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/21/2024. (P,K) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (F,AW) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.