Romero v. Stammitti et al.
| Jose L. Romero |
| Sheriff Phil R. Stammitti, Deputy Sheriff Shea Adkisson, Deputy Sheriff K9 Roy, Correctional Officer C.O. Blevins, Correctional Officer C.O. Fenelus, Correctional Officer C.O. Hall, Correctional Officer C.O. Coonrod, Correctional Officer Chelcie Irish, Correctional Officer C.O. Grant, Correctional Officer C.O. Bored, Correctional Officer C.O. Crum and Correctional Officer C.O. Zemerman |
| 1:2024cv00610 |
| April 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Jose L. Romero. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Court Certification, #2 Inmate Demand Statement)(F,AW) |
| Filing 1 Civil Complaint Under 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983 and 1985 with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Jose L. Romero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285, #4 Note, #5 Envelope) (F,AW) |
| Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
