Moorer v. Experian et al.
| Antoinette Moorer |
| Experian, Equifax and Transunion |
| 1:2024cv00634 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Transunion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Transunion filed by Transunion. (Huse, William) |
| Filing 2 Attorney Appearance by William M. Huse filed by on behalf of Transunion. (Huse, William) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Euclid Municipal Court, case number 24CV100608 Filing fee paid $ 405, receipt number AOHNDC-12497456. Filed by Transunion. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Small Claims Court Summons, #3 Exhibit B-Small Claims Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit C-Experian's Consent To Removal, #5 Exhibit D-Equifax's Consent To Removal) (Huse, William) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
