Najjar v. Attorney General of the United States, et al
| Thomas Najjar |
| Attorney General of the United States, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Associate Director, USCUS Service Center Operations Directorate, Director, Potomac Service Center, Acting District Director, Cleveland U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Cleveland Field Office Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2024cv00706 |
| April 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons were provided, no summons were issued. (F,AW) |
| Filing 2 Supplement - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Thomas Najjar. (Bartell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $405.00, receipt number AOHNDC-12516762. Filed by Thomas Najjar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt Notice and Status) (Bartell, Jonathan) |
| Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
