Stearman v. SCT Operations Inc. et al.
Jason Stearman |
SCT Operations Inc. and Brendan Anderson |
1:2024cv00865 |
May 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
J Philip Calabrese |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Motion for attorney Eugene E. Murphy, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee paid, $120.00. Receipt #151845. Filed by Plaintiff Jason Stearman. Document was digitally signed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing) (R,AP) |
Filing 3 Motion for attorney Tyler J. Geppert to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee paid, $120.00. Receipt #151845. Filed by Plaintiff Jason Stearman. Document was digitally signed. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing) (R,AP) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (R,AP) |
Filing 1 Complaint against SCT Operations Inc. and Brendan Anderson. Filing fee paid, $405.00. Receipt #151844. Filed by Jason Stearman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Letter of Understanding, #3 Exhibit B - Employment Agreement, #4 Envelopes) (R,AP) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP) |
Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (R,AP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.