Ealom v. University Circle Police Department et al.
| Vincent L. Ealom |
| University Circle Police Department, Judson Manor/Judson Senior Living/Judson Senior Living Communities, Glover Roston, James Hairston, Jamey Hoffman and Jacob Lockhart |
| 1:2024cv00891 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (R,AP) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, case number CV-24-995717 with jury demand. Filing fee paid, $405.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12565587. Filed by Jamey Hoffman, Glover Roston, Judson Manor/Judson Senior Living/Judson Senior Living Communities, Jacob Lockhart, University Circle Police Department, James Hairston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Complaint, #4 Affidavit of Indigency of Vincent Ealom, #5 Pleading University Circle Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint) (Kelley, Steven) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (R,AP) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (R,AP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
