Confere v. Mackey
| Dana Confere, III |
| Warden Misty Mackey |
| 1:2024cv01169 |
| July 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Judgment Entry dismissing the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge John R. Adams on 8/27/24. (K,C)
|
|
Filing 4
Opinion and Order dismissing the petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. This dismissal is without prejudice to Petitioner's re-filing a petition in a new case demonstrating he has fully exhausted his state court remedies. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge John R. Adams on 8/27/24. (K,C)
|
|
Copy of #4 Memorandum Opinion and Order and #5 Judgment, mailed to Dana Confere III at Lake Erie Corr. on 8/29/24. Related document(s) #4 , #5 . (K,C)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplement to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) - Civil Cover Sheet (first page) filed by Dana Confere, III. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(F,AW)
|
|
Financial Transaction in the amount of $5.00 received from Dana Confere, III. Receipt #153118. Related document(s) #1 . (R,AP)
|
|
Filing 2
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi. (S,HR)
|
|
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition, #2 Administrative Track Order, and a blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Petitioner at Lake Erie Correctional on 7/12/24. (S,HR)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid. Filed by Dana Confere, III. (Attachments: #1 Summit County Motion for Modification of Sentence) (S,HR)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (S,HR)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (S,HR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Confere v. Mackey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Dana Confere, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Misty Mackey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
