Flannigan v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
| Donald Flannigan |
| Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics and John Doe |
| 1:2026cv00751 |
| March 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] The Court has reviewed Plaintiff Donald Flannigan's Notice Correcting Citizenship. (Doc. No. #5 .) Based on the information contained therein, the Court is satisfied, at this time, that diversity jurisdiction exists in this matter. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 4/6/2026. (P,K)
|
| Filing 7 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (F,AW) |
| Filing 6 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Donald Flannigan. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons AO440)(Taubman, Bruce) |
| Filing 5 Notice Correcting Citizenship filed by Donald Flannigan. Related document(s) #4 , #1 .(Taubman, Bruce) |
|
Filing 4
Order: Plaintiff fails to allege his citizenship. Accordingly, by no later than fourteen days (14) from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall identify his state of citizenship (as opposed to his residency). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/31/2026. (P,K)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided and was not issued. (B,Ch) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Donald Flannigan. Related document(s) #1 . (Taubman, Bruce) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (B,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (B,Ch) |
|
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/31/2026. (P,K)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Filing fee paid $405.00, Receipt number AOHNDC-13597373. Filed by Donald Flannigan. (Taubman, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
