Nadeem v. DHLS Federal Agency et al.
| Ashgar Muhommad Nadeem |
| DHLS Federal Agency and Cuyahoga County |
| 1:2026cv01752 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| David A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Ashgar Muhommad Nadeem. Related document(s) #1 . (F,AW) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Ashgar Muhommad Nadeem. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (F,AW) |
| Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (F,AW) |
| Remark by Clerk re Service Upon U.S. Government Defendant. If a U.S. Government agency or officer is sued, you must provide summons for that defendant, for the U.S. Attorney General (Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530) and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio (801 West Superior Avenue, Suite 400, Cleveland, OH 44113-1852). Copy of this notice sent to Ashgar Muhommad Nadeem at 1277 Love Avenue, Lakewood, OH 44107 on 7/27/2026. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
