Downard et al v. Ceridian Corporation et al
Thomas Downard and Candy Downard |
Ceridian Corporation, Ford Motor Company doing business as Sutton's Quality Ford, Inc. and Medical Mutual of Ohio |
3:2002cv07226 |
May 2, 2002 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
David A Katz |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2002. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER case settled & dismissed w/o prejudice. Parties to bear own costs. Any subsequent order by parties re settlement shall supersede this order. Court retains jurisdiction to reopen if necessary. Judge David A. Katz (G, C) |
Filing 24 Joint Status Report filed by all parties. (Gorman, Robert) |
Filing 23 ORDER phone status held 7/22/02. Written status report due by 8/5/02. Judge David A. Katz (G, C) |
Filing 22 Initial Disclosures filed by Medical Mutual of Ohio. (Gorman, Robert) |
Filing 21 Initial Disclosures filed by all plaintiffs. (Borgess, Pamela) |
Filing 20 Initial Disclosures filed by Ford Motor Company. (G, D) |
Filing 19 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. CMC held 6/17/02. Phone status set for 7/22/02 at 8:45 AM. Judge David A. Katz(G, C) |
Filing 18 ORDER. Judge David A. Katz. This case is hereby ordered into the court's electronic filing system (ECF) All pleadings/orders shall be filed electronically. (B, C) |
Filing 17 Marginal Order granting motion to attend CMC on 6/17/02 by telephone.(Judge David A. Katz) (Related Doc #16 ) (R, Ci) |
Filing 16 Motion to attend by telephone (Case Management Conference) filed by Ceridian Corporation. (Mersol, Gregory) |
Filing 15 Report of Parties Planning Meeting filed by all parties. (Borgess, Pamela) |
Filing 14 MARGINAL ENTRY ORDER granting deft Medical Mutual's motion for leave to attend cmc by phone. Judge David A. Katz (Related Doc #11 ) (B, C) |
Filing 13 MARGINAL ENTRY ORDER granting deft Ford's motion to attend CMC by telephone Judge David A. Katz (Related Doc #12 ) (B, C) |
Filing 12 Motion to attend by telephone the case management conference filed by Ford Motor Company. (G, D) |
Filing 11 Motion for leave to Participate in Case Management Conference Via Telephone filed by Medical Mutual of Ohio. (Gorman, Robert) |
Filing 10 Response to Removal Order filed by Medical Mutual of Ohio. (Gorman, Robert) |
Filing 9 Response to Removal Order of Defendant Ceridian Corporation filed by Ceridian Corporation. (Mersol, Gregory) |
Filing 8 Answer to Complaint filed by Medical Mutual of Ohio. (Gorman, Robert) |
Filing 7 Answer to Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company. (McNellie, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 Answer to Complaint filed by Ceridian Corporation. (Mersol, Gregory) |
Filing 5 Notice: Case Management Conference to be held on 6/17/2002 at 03:00 PM at Chambers 210; recommended track: expedited (R, Ci) |
Filing 4 Removal Order; US District Court assumes jurisdiction of Lucas County Common Pleas Case 200202325. (Judge David A. Katz) (R, Ci) |
Filing 3 Notice of Placement of case in the CM/ECF Docketing System (G, D) |
Filing 2 Case Information Statement ; recommended track: standard; ECF requested filed by Ford Motor Company. (G, D) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lucas Co. Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-200202325 (Complaint attached). Filed by Ford Motor Company. Filing fee paid; receipt number 313812. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(G, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.