Exact Software North America, Inc. v. Infocon, Inc.
| Exact Software North America, Inc. |
| Infocon, Inc. |
| Goldman & Rosen, Karen Kelly Grasso and J. Fox DeMoisey |
| 3:2003cv07183 |
| April 16, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Marion |
| James G. Carr |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
397
Corrected Order: Judgment be entered in the amount of $1,200,000, plus accrued interest, in favor of J. Fox DeMoisey, Esq., and against Infocon, Inc. J. Fox DeMoisey shall comply with Local Rule 67.2 (LR Appendix E) to have the funds released from the Clerk of Court. (Order corrected on page 29, paragraph 2, to reflect the correct amount of $1,400,000.). Judge James G. Carr on 4/5/2012. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
395
Order: Judgment be entered in the amount of $1,200,000, plus accrued interest, in favor of J. Fox DeMoisey, Esq., and against Infocon, Inc.. J. Fox DeMoisey shall comply with Local Rule 67.2 (LR Appendix E) to have the funds released from the Clerk of Court.Judge James G. Carr on 4/4/2012. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
379
Order : defendant Infocon's motions to preclude expert testimony, strike summary exhibit and preclude evidence about treatment of settlement proceeds for tax purposes are overruled, as provided herein. (Related Doc # 365 )(Related Doc # 366 )(Related Doc # 367 ). Judge James G. Carr on 10/19/2011.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
361
Order: DeMoisey's motion regarding Infocon's intent to submit evidence alleging malpractice and misconduct is denied. DeMoisey's motion to strike Infocon's jury request is granted. Infocon's motion with respect to the preclusive effect of the 8/4/2010 order is granted as to evidence of a contingent fee agreement; denied as to a proposed cap on recovery; and denied as to lodestar recovery. A telephone pretrial is scheduled for July 6, 2011 at 3:30p.m. The Court will initiate the phone call. 351 353 352 . Judge James G. Carr on 6/22/2011. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
343
Order : the motion of Infocon Systems, Inc. for J. Fox DeMoisey to Post Surety for Advanced Funds is denied. (Related Doc # 340 ). Judge James G. Carr on 5/29/2009.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
336
Order : Clerk shall disburse the amount in excess of $1,120,000 of the funds presently in her escrow account as a result of this litigation to the defendant Infocon; the balance of $1,120,000 shall be retained in an interest-bearing account pending further court order. The Clerk shall deduct a registry fee, at the time that the account is closed, as a percentage of interest earned on the investment, not to exceed (10%) ten percent. (Related Doc # 331 ). Judge James G. Carr on 2/4/09.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
277
Order : that J. Fox DeMoisey's motion for summary judgment is overruled. (Related Doc # 263 ). Judge James G. Carr on 6/30/2008.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
268
Order : Motion to exceed page limits granted. Opposition to motion for summary judgment to be filed by April 30, 2008; reply due May 15, 2008. (Related Doc # 262 ). Signed by Judge James G. Carr on 3/17/2008.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
261
Order : Infocon's motion to disqualify John Carey, Esq., as local counsel of record for Infocon's former lead counsel is denied, without prejudice. The Clerk shall correct the docket sheet per n.1 herein. (Related Doc # 256 ). Signed by Judge James G. Carr on 2/26/2008.(S,AL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
