Townsend v. Erwin
3:2006cv00563 |
March 10, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Toledo Office |
William H. Baughman, Jr. |
Patricia A. Gaughan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: The Magistrate Judge determined that the Petition's claims were procedurally defaulted. This Court agrees as the record shows that petitioner failed to pursue a timely appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court of the state appellate courts denial of his motion for delayed appeal. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed. Furthermore, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/15/08. re 12 (LC,S) |
Filing 12 Report and Recommendation that Townsend's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as time-barred (Related Doc # 1 ). Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2008. Referral terminated (Related Doc # 5 ). Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. removed from case. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 02/29/2008. (Hard copy mailed to petitioner.) (G,GS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Townsend v. Erwin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.