Townsend v. Erwin
Case Number: 3:2006cv00563
Filed: March 10, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
Presiding Judge: William H. Baughman, Jr.
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Gaughan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: The Magistrate Judge determined that the Petition's claims were procedurally defaulted. This Court agrees as the record shows that petitioner failed to pursue a timely appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court of the state appellate courts denial of his motion for delayed appeal. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed. Furthermore, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/15/08. re 12 (LC,S)
February 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Report and Recommendation that Townsend's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as time-barred (Related Doc # 1 ). Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2008. Referral terminated (Related Doc # 5 ). Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. removed from case. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 02/29/2008. (Hard copy mailed to petitioner.) (G,GS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Townsend v. Erwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?