Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation v. YouTube, Inc. Featured Case

Plaintiff Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation operates a website at utube.com. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of confusion in the minds of consumers, the spillover of nuisance traffic to plaintiff's website has destroyed the value of plaintiff's trademark and internet property, repeatedly caused the shut down of plaintiff's website, increased plaintiff's internet costs and damaged the plaintiff's good reputation.

Additional Resources

Plaintiff: Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation
Defendant: YouTube, Inc., Chad Hurley and Steve Chen
Counter-Claimant: YouTube, Inc.
Counter-Defendant: Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation
Case Number: 3:2006cv02628
Filed: October 30, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Wood
Presiding Judge: James G. Carr
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2007 Filing 31
Order. Status conference held 11/9/07. Plaintiff to submit settlement offer to defendant by 11/19/07, or show cause why complaint should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Status Report due by 11/30/2007. Signed by Judge James G. Carr on 11/09/2007.(S,JM)
October 31, 2007 Filing 30
Status Report filed by YouTube, Inc.. (Kamber, Matthias)
September 25, 2007 Filing 28
Order of Pretrial Conference held on 9/18/2007. Parties to file dismissal entry or status reports on or before October 31, 2007. Signed by Judge James G. Carr on 9/25/2007.(S,AL)
September 14, 2007 Filing 27
Attorney Appearance for Fritz Byers by Michael E. Dockins filed by on behalf of Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation. (Dockins, Michael)
July 10, 2007 Filing 26
Reply to Counterclaim OF YOUTUBE, Inc., (Related Doc # 25) filed by Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation. (DeGidio, Jr., Anthony) Modified on 7/13/2007 (B, T).
June 18, 2007 Filing 25
Answer To Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims - Demand For Jury Trial (Related Doc # 12), Counterclaim against Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation filed by YouTube, Inc.. (Kamber, Matthias) Modified on 6/26/2007 (B, T).
June 4, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 24
Order: YouTube's motion to dismiss Universal's second amended complaint is granted, without prejudice, with respect to Universal's: Second Claim for Relief (Cancellation of YouTubes Trademark Applications); Fourth Claim for Relief (Trespass to Chattels); Fifth Claim for Relief (Nuisance); Sixth Claim for Relief (Negligence) and Eighth Claim for Relief (Violation of Ohios RICO Act). YouTube's motion to dismiss Universal's second amended complaint is denied with respect to Universal's: First Claim for Relief (Unfair Competition);Third Claim for Relief (Dilution Under Ohio Law) and Seventh Claim for Relief (Deceptive Trade Practices). (Related Doc # 14). Signed by Judge James G. Carr on 6/4/2007.(S,AL)
May 2, 2007 Filing 23
Sur-Reply to 21 Defendant's motion to dismiss filed by plaintiffs. (S,AL)
March 30, 2007 Filing 20
Reply to 14 Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Rule 12(b)(2) & (6)) filed by Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, YouTube, Inc.. (Kamber, Matthias)
March 8, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 18
Order of Case Management Conference held on 3/5/2007. Track: standard. Plaintiff's opposition to motion to dismiss due March 15, 2007; reply due April 2, 2007. Further scheduling held in abeyance pending adjudication of motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge James G. Carr on 3/8/2007.(S,AL)
February 23, 2007 Filing 17
Report of Parties' Planning Meeting. Parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge. filed by all parties. (DeGidio, Jr., Anthony)
February 19, 2007 Filing 16
Attorney Appearance by Michael E. Dockins filed by on behalf of Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation. (Dockins, Michael)
February 1, 2007 Filing 15
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by YouTube, Inc.. Related document(s)14.(Kamber, Matthias) Modified on 2/2/2007 to add corporate parent (Google, Inc.) (B, T).
January 30, 2007 Filing 13
Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: case management conference to be held on 3/5/2007 at 01:30 PM before Judge Hon. James G. Carr. Recommneded track: expedited. Out of town counsel may participate by phone; parties need not attend. (S,AL)
December 20, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 9
Marginal Order granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Mark A. Lemley, Mathias A. Kamber and Michael H. Page for YouTube, Inc. (Related Doc # 8). Signed by Judge James G. Carr on 12/20/2006.(S, A)
December 5, 2006 Filing 8
Motion for attorney Michael H. Page, Mark A. Lemley and Matthias A. Kamber to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee 100, receipt number 2241872. filed by YouTube, Inc.. (Cornett, Harry)
November 14, 2006 Filing 5
Waiver of Summons by Youtube Inc. returned. Waiver mailed on October 30, 2006 filed by Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation (DeGidio, Jr., Anthony)
November 1, 2006 Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation. (DeGidio, Jr., Anthony)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation v. YouTube, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation
Represented By: Richard G. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YouTube, Inc.
Represented By: Carolyn C. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Hurley
Represented By: Carolyn C. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Chen
Represented By: Carolyn C. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-claimant: YouTube, Inc.
Represented By: Carolyn C. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-defendant: Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation
Represented By: Richard G. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?