MMK Group, LLC v. The SheShells Company, LLC et al
MMK Group, LLC |
The SheShells Company, LLC, Thomas Hass, Michael Teadt and Thermodyn Corporation |
The SheShells Company, LLC, Thomas Hass and Michael Teadt |
MMK Group, LLC |
3:2007cv00055 |
January 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Toledo Office |
Lucas |
David A. Katz |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 330 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 325 Motion for Judgment NOV; ; denying Motion for judgment as a matter of law (Related Doc # 326 ); denying 233 Sealed Motion; denying 234 Sealed Motion. Judge David A. Katz on 12/3/10.(G,C) |
Filing 270 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying Motion to dismiss (Related Doc # 201 ); granting in part and denying in part 228 Sealed Motion; denying Motion for summary judgment (Related Doc # 229 ); denying 230 Sealed Motion; denying 231 Sealed Motion; denying 232 Sealed Motion. Judge David A. Katz on 3/23/10.(G,C) |
Filing 185 MEMORANDUM OPINION Counterclaim/Third Party Defendant Bruces motion to dismiss granted (Related Doc # 156 ); Counterclaim/Third Party Defendants MMK, M&MK, Pawloski, and Bruces motion to dismiss Thermodyn Defendants Third Party Complaint and Counterclaims denied (Related Doc # 157 ); Plaintiff MMK's motion to dismiss SheShells Defendants Amended Counterclaim granted in part and denied in part Related Doc # 181 ). Judge David A. Katz on 12/24/08.(G,C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.