Buck et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Linda Buck and Daniel Buck |
| Ford Motor Company and John Doe Inc. |
| 3:2008cv00998 |
| April 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
| Lucas |
| James G. Carr |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
Order : granting defendant's Motion for summary judgment. (Related Doc # 103 ). Judge James G. Carr on 6/25/2012.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
102
Order denying Motion to compel discovery. (Related Doc # 96 ) Status Conference set for 3/19/2012 at 02:30 PM in Chambers 210 before Judge James G. Carr. Out of town counsel may participate by phone. Judge James G. Carr on 2/23/2012.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
94
Order : Defendant's motion to exclude Keith Armstrong's general causation testimony is granted.Defendant's motion to exclude Samuel J. Sero's general causation and specific causation testimony is granted. Defendant's m otion to exclude the opinion testimony of Dr. Berg is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' motion to exclude the testimony of Vincent DeClercq is denied. A scheduling conference is set for September 20, 2011 at noon. Out of town counsel may participate by phone; the Court will initiate the phone call. (Related Doc # 56 )(Related Doc # 58 )(Related Doc # 59 )(Related Doc # 60 ). Judge James G. Carr on 8/30/2011.(S,AL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
