Bloedow v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
| Rod R. Bloedow |
| The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and CSX Transportation, Inc. |
| 3:2008cv02914 |
| December 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act Office |
| Allen |
| David A Katz |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
| 45 U.S.C. § 151 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendants' motion to reassign denied. #13 Defendants' motions to dismiss granted. #14 #15 . Judge David A. Katz on 7/31/09. (G,C) |
| Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying Motion to reassign case, (Related Doc #13 ); granting Motion to dismiss (Related Doc #14 ); granting Motion to dismiss (Related Doc #15 ). Judge David A. Katz on 7/31/09.(G,C) |
| Filing 25 Reply to response to #13 Motion to reassign case to Judge Ann Aldrich filed by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Lewis, John) |
| Filing 24 Reply to response to #14 Motion to dismiss filed by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - March 3, 2008 Ltr to R.D. Hiel from Rick Finamore, #2 Appendix BLET System Agreement No. 1-023-07 Pgs. 11 and 12)(Lewis, John) |
| Filing 23 Reply to response to #15 Motion to dismiss filed by The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. (Wolly, Michael) |
| Filing 22 Marginal Entry Order granting extension to 3/31/09 to reply to opposition to motion to reassign #21 . Judge David A. Katz on 3/25/09.(G,C) |
| Filing 21 Motion for extension of time to reply to plaintiff's opposition to motion to reassign until March 31, 2009 filed by Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. (Lewis, John) Modified on 4/9/2009 (R,Ci). |
| Filing 20 Opposition to #14 Motion to dismiss, #15 Motion to dismiss filed by Rod R. Bloedow. (Attachments: #1 Pleading Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1-March 3, 2008 letter, #3 Exhibit 2-Case: Achilli v. Nissen)(Franklin, John) |
| Filing 19 Opposition to #13 Motion to reassign case to Judge Ann Aldrich filed by Rod R. Bloedow. (Franklin, John) |
| Filing 18 Marginal Entry Order granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to 3/17/09 to respond to pending motions re #14 #13 #15 . Judge David A. Katz on 2/19/2009.(R,Ci) |
| Filing 17 Motion for extension of time until March 17, 2009 to respond to Defendants' motions filed by Plaintiff Rod R. Bloedow. (Franklin, John) |
| Filing 16 Attorney Appearance by Faten A. Eidi filed by on behalf of Rod R. Bloedow. (Eidi, Faten) |
| Filing 15 Motion to dismiss filed by Defendant The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Wolly, Michael) |
| Filing 14 Motion to dismiss filed by Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support Memorandum in Support of Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A - Bloedow's 7/3/02 Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Judge Aldrich's May 4, 2004 Memorandum and Order, #4 Exhibit C - Bloedow's September 6, 2007 Letter to Finamore, #5 Appendix Unreported Case Citations)(Lewis, John) |
| Filing 13 Motion to reassign case to Judge Ann Aldrich filed by CSX Transportation, Inc., The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Reassign, #2 Exhibit A Plaintiff's 7-3-02 Complaint, #3 Exhibit B Judge Aldrich's May 4, 2004 Memorandum and Order)(Lewis, John) |
Filing 12
Order granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers answer due 2/12/2009. Judge David A. Katz on 1/30/2009.(R,Ci)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until February 12, 2009 to answer filed by Defendant The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. Related document(s) #1 . (Wolly, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Marginal Entry Order granting Motion to extend time for CSX Transportation, Inc. to respond to complaint to 2/12/09 (Related Doc #9 ). Judge David A. Katz on 1/26/2009.(R,Ci) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for leave to Extend Time to Move or Plead filed by Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Brosky, Gilbert) |
| Filing 8 Return of Service Executed upon CSX Transportation, Inc. by US ordinary mail, certified, return receipt on January 8, 2009 filed on behalf of Rod R. Bloedow (Franklin, John) |
| Filing 7 Marginal Entry Order granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers answer due 2/6/2009. Judge David A. Katz on 1/8/2009.(R,Ci) |
| Filing 6 Motion for extension of time until February 6, 2009 to answer filed by Defendant The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. Related document(s) #1 . (Wolly, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued to atty for service upon CSX Transportation, Inc. (C,D) |
| Filing 4 Praecipe for issuance of Summons. filed by Rod R. Bloedow. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Exhibit A-Letter from CT Corp.)(Franklin, John) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed upon The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and CSX Transportation, Inc. by US ordinary mail, certified, return receipt on December 18, 2008 filed on behalf of Rod R. Bloedow (Franklin, John) |
| Filing 2 Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon CSX Transportation, Inc., The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (Attachment: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (M,C) |
| Judge David A. Katz assigned to case. (M,C) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against all defendants. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 06470000000003334459, filed by Rod R. Bloedow. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Franklin, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
