Coley et al v. Lucas County, Ohio
| Denise M. Coley, DeCarlos A. Benton, M. L. and Carla Benton |
| Lucas County, Ohio |
| 3:2009cv00008 |
| January 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Lucas |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
190
Order: The § 1988 analysis applies to the calculation of the attorneys' fees and costs incurred by plaintiffs' counsel. The prevailing hourly rate in Toledo, Ohio applies to the same calculation. Due to the delay in issuing this order, it appears that February 21, 2017, is no longer a workable date to hold a settlement conference regarding the fees and costs to which plaintiffs'counsel are entitled. The Clerk will forthwith set a telephonic conference to consider whether tovacate that date and schedule further deadlines. Judge James G. Carr on 1/11/17. (C,D)
|
|
Filing
115
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant Telb's 90 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Motion to Dismiss is granted with respect to the following claims: (1) aiding and abetting; (2) civil conspiracy under Ohio law; (3) civil co nspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1983; (4) civil conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1985; (5) state RICO violations; (6) federal RICO violations; and (7) liability, imputed by virtue of R.C. § 311.05 for negligence and intentional infliction of e motional distress. These claims are dismissed in their entirety. Defendant Telbs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Motion to Dismiss is denied with respect to the following claims: (1) failure to sufficiently train and supervise employee s against the use of excessive force under 18 U.S.C. § 1983; and (2) liability, imputed by virtue of R.C. § 311.05 for wrongful death, assault and battery, excessive force, and failure to provide medical treatment. Related document(s) 90 Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong on 1/23/2014. (B,TM)
|
|
Filing
111
Memorandum Decision and Order: For these reasons, Defendant Grays Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [and/or Motion to Dismiss] is denied as to these claims: 1. Excessive Force. 2. Failure to Provide Medical Care 3. Assault and battery. 4. W rongful death. 5. Conspiracy under 42 U.S. C. § 1985(1). Defendant Grays Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [and/or Motion to Dismiss] is granted as to these claims. 1. Civil Conspiracy under 42 U. S. C. § 1983. 2. Conspiracy under 42 U.S . C. §§ 1985(2), (3). 3. RICO. 4. Aiding and abetting. 5. Civil Conspiracy under Ohio law. 6. Intentional infliction of emotional distress. 7. Negligence/recklessness/bad faith. Related document(s) 92 . Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong on 1/17/2014. (B,TM)
|
|
Filing
109
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The 72 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Lucas County and Defendant Lucas County Sheriffs Office is denied. Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong on 12/27/2013. (B,TM)
|
|
Filing
48
Memorandum Decision and Order granting Motion to lift stay (Related Doc # 45 ) and reopen case. Telephone Status Conference set for 11/2/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong. Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong on 10/26/12.(A,P)
|
|
Filing
43
Memorandum Decision and Order granting 32 Defendants' Motion to stay. This case is treated as closed for statistical purposes and the case may be reopened upon a motion filed by either party at the conclusion of the criminal appeals. Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong on 11/18/11. (A,P)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
