Franklin Park Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 3:2009cv00792
Filed: April 7, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
Presiding Judge: James G. Carr
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1221 Auto Dealers Suits Against Manufacturers
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 88 Memorandum Opinion and Order: This Court holds Defendant did not have a fiduciary duty to Plaintiff and Defendants approval of the Rouen/Brondes transaction was neither predatory nor discriminatory. For these reasons Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and this case is dismissed ( re 81 ). Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/31/11. (C,D)
July 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Ford's Motion to Dismiss for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted (Doc. No. 34 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Franklin Park's claims under the ADDCA and under Revised Code Section 4517.59(A) are dismissed; the common law fiduciary duty claim and the claim under Revised Code Section 4517.59(M) remain. Telephone Status Conference to be held 7/7/2010 at 09:00 AM. The Court will initiate the call. Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/2/10. (G,D)
January 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part Motion for judgment on the pleadings (Related Doc # 21 ). Judge David A. Katz on 1/19/10.(G,C)
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order : plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, without prejudice. A scheduling conference is set for September 21, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. (Related Doc # 11 )(Related Doc # 13 ). Judge James G. Carr on 9/2/2009.(S,AL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin Park Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?