MCCLOSKEY v. White et al
| MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY |
| Thomas White, JOHN DOE and VILLAGE OF OTTAWA HILLS, OHIO |
| 3:2009cv01273 |
| June 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Lucas |
| David A. Katz |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
196
ORDER denying Motion for reconsideration as stated herein. Related Doc # 180 . Judge David A. Katz on 2/3/12.(G,C)
|
|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to compel production of LEADS data (Related Doc # 138 ); granting Ohio State Highway Patrol Motion for protective order (Related Doc # 144 ); denying Plaintiff's motion for protective order (Related Doc # 150 ); Plaintiffs motion to compel production of surveillance records granted in part and denied in part as stated herein (Related Doc # 151 ). Judge David A. Katz on 12/20/11.(G,C)
|
|
Filing
73
AMENDED Memorandum Opinion and Order denying motion to file amended complaint. Judge David A. Katz on 6/10/11. (G,C)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant White's motion to stay granted (Related Doc # 43 ); Defendant Whites motion to bifurcate discovery and trial is denied with prejudice as to discovery and without prejudice as to trial. Related Doc # 44 ); Defendant Ottawa Hills motion to stay granted(Related Doc # 46 ). Judge David A. Katz on 3/1/11.(G,C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
