Brownlow v. Ohio Reformatory For Women
Plaintiff: Easter Brownlow
Defendant: Ohio Reformatory for Women
Case Number: 3:2009cv01798
Filed: August 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Out Of State
Presiding Judge: Vernelis K. Armstrong
Presiding Judge: David A. Katz
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION Adopting Report and Recommendation. Respondent's motion to dismiss granted 7 . Petition dismissed as time barred. Court has determined sua sponte that no certificate of probable cause should issue. Judge David A. Katz on 11/4/10. (G,C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brownlow v. Ohio Reformatory For Women
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Easter Brownlow
Represented By: George A. Katchmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio Reformatory for Women
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?