Rittner v. Williams
Plaintiff: Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Defendant: Jesse Williams
Case Number: 3:2010cv00435
Filed: March 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing action without prejudice. Plaintiff's various pending motions Doc. Nos. 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 are denied as moot. The Court certifies pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/12/10. (G,D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rittner v. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesse Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?