Local 134 Board of Trustees of the Toledo Roofers Pension Plan v. Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. et al
| Local 134 Board of Trustees of the Toledo Roofers Pension Plan |
| Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. and Enterprise Roofing & Remodeling Services, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01869 |
| August 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Lucas |
| James G. Carr |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
Order. Trustees motion for issuance of a final judgment (Doc. 97 ) granted; Services motion for reconsideration (Doc. 103 ) denied; and Trustees request for sanctions denied, as I previously granted Services leave to file an opposition to the Trustees motion for issuance of a final judgment, and it does not appear that Services sought reconsideration in bad faith. Judge James G. Carr on 3/13/2014.(G,D)
|
|
Filing
84
Order. Enterprise Roofing & Remodeling Services, Inc., be, and the same hereby is found liable and responsible for the judgment (Doc. 59) previously entered in favor of plaintiff Local 134 Board of Trustees of the Toledo Roofers Pension Plan and against Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.The Clerk shall set a status/scheduling conference forthwith. Judge James G. Carr on 6/3/2013. (G,D)
|
|
Filing
53
Order : Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against Enterprise Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc. (Doc. 44) is granted. On or before March 15, 2012, plaintiff shall submit a statement as to total judgment and, as well, the amount of attorn eys fees claimed as to Enterprise Roofing and Sheet Metal; the Clerk shall thereon enter judgment accordingly. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against Enterprise Roofing and Services, Inc., be, and the same hereby is denied, without prejudice. A status/scheduling conference is set for March 19, 2012 at 2:00pm. Out of town counsel may participate by phone. (Related Doc # 43 ). Judge James G. Carr on 2/21/2012.(S,AL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Local 134 Board of Trustees of the Toledo Roofers Pension Plan v. Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Local 134 Board of Trustees of the Toledo Roofers Pension Plan | |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Koenig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Enterprise Roofing & Remodeling Services, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
