Kinzel, et al v. Bank of America, et al
| Richard L. Kinzel, Judith A. Kinzel and Brett Kinzel |
| Bank of America, Individually And As Successor in Interest to Merrill Lynch Bank U.S.A.; Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust Company; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, John Thain, Kenneth D. Lewis, BlackRock, Inc., Heidi Harms, Jonathon Sargent and Douglas Rosen |
| 3:2010cv02169 |
| September 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Erie |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
246
Memorandum Opinion and Order: I conclude Merrill Lynch is entitled to judgment on the Kinzels' claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. I also conclude the Kinzels are entitled to judgment on Merrill Lynch's counterclaims for breach of contract and indemnification. Finally, Merrill Lynch's motion for reconsideration is denied. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/14/2016. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
199
Order: ruling on objections to depositions (see order for full details). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/18/2014. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
188
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion, (Doc. No. 172), is granted in part and denied in part; (2) Defendants' motion, (Doc. No. 170), is granted in part and denied in part as moot; and (3) Plaintiffs' motion, (Doc. No. 161), is denied. re 161 , 170 , 172 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/17/14. (SG,D)
|
|
Filing
154
Memorandum Opinion and Order : Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 115), is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 113), is denied. As a matter of law, Richard and Judith Kinzel, as individuals, are parties to the LMA Agreement through the 'other parties' clause. There remain genuine issues of material fact as to whether Defendants violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in exercising their discretion to liquidate collateral securing Plaintiffs' loan. 113 115 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 1/30/2014.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
153
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint and withdraw the negligent breach of contract claim is granted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied as moot. re 151 147 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 1/24/2014. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
141
Memorandum Opinion and Order : Plaintiffs' motion to conform the pleadings to the evidence is denied as moot. Plaintiffs' amended motion is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs may proceed with a claim for negligent breach of contract with respect to Defendants' alleged failure to properly credit the $100,000 payment only. Plaintiffs also may continue to pursue their claim for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Defendants' motion to stri ke Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. As a matter of law, Plaintiffs are not entitled to summary judgment on Issues I, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, or IX. Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion shall stand with respect to Issues II, III, and X. (Related Doc # 120 ) 130 136 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 9/17/2013.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
137
Memorandum, Opinion and Order : Defendants' motion is granted. Plaintiffs' jury demand is stricken and this case will be removed from the jury calendar. 104 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/30/2013.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
97
Memorandum Opinion and Order : Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration and motion for leave to file a third amended complaint denied. Defendants' motion for partial judgment on the pleadings denied. (Related Doc # 58 ) 71 79 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/13/2013.(S,AL)
|
|
Filing
48
Order : Defendants' motion to dismiss count one of plaintiffs' complaint is denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss all other counts in plaintiffs' complaint is granted. A scheduling conference is set for November 21, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. Out of town counsel may participate by phone. (Related Doc # 41 ). Judge James G. Carr on 11/1/2011.(S,AL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
