Brandeberry v. Johnson

Brandeberry v. Johnson

Petitioner:	Scott Orrin Brandeberry
Respondent:	Rod Johnson
Case Number:	3:2012cv01185
Filed:	May 14, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Toledo Office
County:	Lucas
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2015	Filing 23 Memorandum Opinion: Petitioner's objections to the R&R are overruled. Except as set forth in this Memorandum Opinion, the Court accepts the findings in the R&R, and specifically accepts the ultimate conclusion that the petition should be denied. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Section 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). (Related Doc. No. 20 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 4/1/2015. (P,J)
October 1, 2012	Filing 13 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the above-entitled action (Doc. No. 12 ) and accepts the same. Accordingly, because respondent has not failed to timely respond to the petition, petitioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/01/2012. (H,KR)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2015

Filing 23 Memorandum Opinion: Petitioner's objections to the R&R are overruled. Except as set forth in this Memorandum Opinion, the Court accepts the findings in the R&R, and specifically accepts the ultimate conclusion that the petition should be denied. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Section 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). (Related Doc. No. 20 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 4/1/2015. (P,J)

October 1, 2012

Filing 13 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the above-entitled action (Doc. No. 12 ) and accepts the same. Accordingly, because respondent has not failed to timely respond to the petition, petitioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/01/2012. (H,KR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandeberry v. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Scott Orrin Brandeberry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Rod Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?