Bradley v. Turner et al
| Neil Turner and Toney Lee |
| Gregory E. Bradley |
| 3:2012cv01504 |
| June 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Van Wert |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Greg White |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court overrules Petitioners Objections (Doc. # 35 ), and adopts Magistrate White's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 33 ), denies the underlying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 1 ), and denies the Motion for Sanctions. (Doc. # 36 ). Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 4/1/13. (M,M) Modified text and added hyperlinks on 4/1/2013 (S,HR).
|
|
Filing
25
Order. Petitioner's motions are ruled upon as follows: 9 Motion for discovery is denied without prejudice.; 11 Motion to compel is denied.; 14 Motion for request for summary judgment is denied.; 15 Motion to strike Respondent� 39;s request for extension of time is denied.; and 24 Motion to expand the record under Rule 7 is denied without prejudice. The Court, however, grants petitioner time to file his Traverse, hereby ordering it to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Furthermore, petitioner is relieved from sending a service copy of pleadings to the Ohio Attorney General's office that he has sent to the Court for filing in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 10/11/2012. (S,S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
