Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc. et al v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
| Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc. doing business as Englander Southwest, Fraenkel Company doing business as Englander South Central, Tualatin Sleep Products, Inc. doing business as Englander Northwest, Advanced Sleep Concepts doing business as Englander Southeast, Illinois Sleep Products doing business as Englander Midwest, Sleep Inc. doing business as Englander Northeast and White Cross Sleep Products, Inc. doing business as Englander Mid-Atlantic |
| FFP Holdings, LLC, Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc., The Carpenter Company, Flexible Foam Products, Inc., Flexible Foam Products LLC, Scottdel, Inc., Foamex Innovations, Inc., Future Foam, Inc., Vitafoam Products Canada Limited, Vitafoam, Inc., Mohawk Industries Inc., Leggett & Platt Inc., Advanced Urethane Technologies, Inc., Woodbridge Foam Corporation and British Vita Unlimited |
| 3:2012pf10012 |
| April 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Jack Zouhary (MDL2196) |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 15 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
Order of case closing per the attached Order of termination of multidistrict litigation filed in the master docket, MDL 2196, 1:10md2196, document no. 2114. Signed by Judge Jack Zouhary on 11/2/2016. (R,Sh)
|
|
Filing 32
Order of Dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiffs' claims against The Carpenter Company. Related document #31 . Signed by Judge Jack Zouhary (MDL2196) on 1/7/2015. (K,K)
|
| Filing 31 Joint Proposed Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by The Carpenter Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lukitsch, Bethany) |
| Filing 30 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance of Rachel M. Brown filed by Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc.. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 29 Address Change Notice by Thomas G. Shapiro filed by on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Shapiro, Thomas) |
|
Filing 28
Order and Notice of Party Dismissal. This Court grants Doc. 728 in Case No. 10 MD 2196, Motion by Charles E. Tompkins, Thomas Shapiro, Rachel Brown, Patrick McLaughlin to withdraw as attorney for Medi-Pedic Bedding, dba Englander Southwest. Plaintiff Medi-Pedic Bedding's claims reflected in Case Nos. 3:12 PF 10012 and 3:12 PF 10022 are dismissed without prejudice. Judge Jack Zouhary (MDL2196) on 12/2/2013. (D,L)
|
|
Filing 27
Order. Phone Conference held on 10/25/2013 to discuss the Joint Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Direct Action Plaintiff Medi-Pedic Bedding, dba Englander Southwest 728 . Englander Southwest has 21 days from the date of this Order to obtain substitute counsel. If within the same time period substitute counsel for Englander Southwest does not enter an appearance, the above-captioned cases will be dismissed without prejudice. Regardless of whether Englander Southwest obtains substitute counsel within the allotted time period, the Joint Motion to Withdraw 728 will be granted 21 days from the date of this Order. Judge Jack Zouhary (MDL2196) on 11/6/2013. (D,L)
|
|
Filing 26
Order of Dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's claims against defendants Vitafoam, Inc., Vitafoam Products Canada Limited and British Vita Unlimited pursuant to FRCP 41. Judge Jack Zouhary on 8/29/13. (S,R)
|
| Filing 25 Attorney Appearance by Charles E. Tompkins filed by on behalf of Advanced Sleep Concepts, Fraenkel Company, Illinois Sleep Products, Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc., Sleep Inc., Tualatin Sleep Products, Inc., White Cross Sleep Products, Inc.. (Tompkins, Charles) |
| Filing 24 Declaration off Stuart Stoller in Support of Defendant Advanced Urethane Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss filed by Advanced Urethane Technologies, Inc. (Hansberry, John) Modified on 7/11/2012 (S,R). |
| Filing 23 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by The Carpenter Company. (Lukitsch, Bethany) |
| Filing 22 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Flexible Foam Products, Inc.. (Millard, Kendall) |
| Filing 21 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Woodbridge Foam Corporation. (Kop, Allison) |
| Filing 20 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Leggett & Platt Inc.. (Novion, Laurie) |
| Filing 19 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Foamex Innovations, Inc.. (Ryan, Peter) |
| Filing 18 Answer to #1 Complaint,, filed by British Vita Unlimited, Vitafoam Products Canada Limited, Vitafoam, Inc.. (Coleman, Timothy) |
| Filing 17 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Future Foam, Inc.. (Blinn, Meghan) |
| Filing 16 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company. (McGuire, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 Stipulation & Order granting defendant Advanced Urethane Technologies, Inc. extension of time until 7/9/2012 to file answer. re #14 . Judge Jack Zouhary on 6/15/12. (S,R) |
| Filing 14 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Mohawk Industries Inc.. (Bonder, Teresa) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Stipulation of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Advanced Urethane Technologies, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 .(Hansberry, John) |
| Filing 12 Attorney Appearance of Patrick M. McLaughlin and Dennis P. Zapka by Patrick M. McLaughlin filed by on behalf of Advanced Sleep Concepts, Fraenkel Company, Illinois Sleep Products, Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc., Sleep Inc., Tualatin Sleep Products, Inc., White Cross Sleep Products, Inc.. (McLaughlin, Patrick) |
| Filing 11 Attorney Appearance by Rachel M. Brown filed by on behalf of Advanced Sleep Concepts, Fraenkel Company, Illinois Sleep Products, Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc., Sleep Inc., Tualatin Sleep Products, Inc., White Cross Sleep Products, Inc.. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 10 Original Summons issued for service upon British Vita Unlimited, Flexible Foam Products, Inc., Foamex Innovations, Inc., Future Foam, Inc., Leggett & Platt Inc., Mohawk Industries Inc., Scottdel, Inc., The Carpenter Company, Vitafoam Products Canada Limited, Vitafoam, Inc., Woodbridge Foam Corporation. (S,J) |
| Filing 9 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons . filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by White Cross Sleep Products, Inc.. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Sleep Inc.. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Illinois Sleep Products. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Advanced Sleep Concepts. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Tualatin Sleep Products, Inc.. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Fraenkel Company. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc.. (Brown, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Advanced Urethane Technologies, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc., Flexible Foam Products, Inc., Foamex Innovations, Inc., Future Foam, Inc., Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Leggett & Platt Inc., Mohawk Industries Inc., Scottdel, Inc., The Carpenter Company, The Woodbridge Group, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Vitafoam Products Canada Limited, Vitafoam, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 350, Receipt number 0647-5325058. Filed by all Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tompkins, Charles) Modified on 5/1/2012 (S,R). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
