Uselton v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jason S Uselton
Case Number: 3:2013cv00349
Filed: February 15, 2013
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Toledo Office
County: Ashland
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Helmick
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29:2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 5, 2014 37 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion and Order: CSXT's motion for summary judgment is granted. The portion of CSXT's motion that seeks judgment on the pleadings is denied. re 22 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 9/5/2014. (S,AL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Uselton v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason S Uselton
Represented By: Andrew J. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.