Vaughn et al v. Titan International Inc.
||Shirley Vaughn and Metz Kyle
||Titan International Inc.
||February 26, 2013
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||Jeffrey J. Helmick
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 23, 2015
Memorandum Opinion and Order : Motion to exclude witness testimony of Richardson, Smith, Martinez, Swan, and Carr (Doc. No. 62) is denied. Motion to exclude subsequent layoff evidence (Doc. No. 63) is granted in part and denied in part. Motion to exclude evidence of commitment to veterans (Doc. No. 64) is denied without prejudice as premature. Motion to exclude testimony of intimate/personal relationship (Doc. No. 65) is denied without prejudice. Motion to exclude evidence of Vaughn's termination and lawsuit (Doc. No. 66) is denied. (Related Doc # 62 )(Related Doc # 63 ); (Related Doc # 64 )(Related Doc # 65 )(Related Doc # 66 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/23/2015.(S,AL)
|March 3, 2015
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff Shirley Vaughn's motion for an entry of final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (Doc. No. 74) is granted and the Court finds there is no just reason to delay appellate review. re 74 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/3/2015. (S,AL)
|December 5, 2014
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Kyle Metz is denied. re 29 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 12/5/2014. (S,AL)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?