Vaughn et al v. Titan International Inc.
Shirley Vaughn and Metz Kyle |
Titan International Inc. |
3:2013cv00409 |
February 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Toledo Office |
Lucas |
Jeffrey J. Helmick |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 Memorandum Opinion and Order : Motion to exclude witness testimony of Richardson, Smith, Martinez, Swan, and Carr (Doc. No. 62) is denied. Motion to exclude subsequent layoff evidence (Doc. No. 63) is granted in part and denied in part. Motion to exclude evidence of commitment to veterans (Doc. No. 64) is denied without prejudice as premature. Motion to exclude testimony of intimate/personal relationship (Doc. No. 65) is denied without prejudice. Motion to exclude evidence of Vaughn's termination and lawsuit (Doc. No. 66) is denied. (Related Doc # 62 )(Related Doc # 63 ); (Related Doc # 64 )(Related Doc # 65 )(Related Doc # 66 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/23/2015.(S,AL) |
Filing 76 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff Shirley Vaughn's motion for an entry of final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (Doc. No. 74) is granted and the Court finds there is no just reason to delay appellate review. re 74 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/3/2015. (S,AL) |
Filing 52 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Kyle Metz is denied. re 29 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 12/5/2014. (S,AL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.