Crawford, et al. v. Geiger, et al.
| Mark A. Crawford, Brendon M. Reed and Debra Ornelas |
| Donavin L. Geiger, Roy Brock, Cory Lee, Jesse Evilsizer, Robert Gatchel, Daniel Edelbrock, Nicholas Hart, Samuel A. Crish, John Born, Kevin Martin, Jeremy Hollis, Allen County, City of Lima and Village of Elida |
| 3:2013cv01883 |
| August 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Allen |
| James G. Carr |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
Order: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. 80 ) be, and the same hereby is, denied. The motions for summary judgment of Troopers Gatchel and Edelbrock, and Deputy Brock (Docs. 69 , 77 ), be, and the same her eby are, granted in their entirety. The motions for summary judgment of Deputies Geiger and Lee, Sergeant Hart and Officer Evilsizer (Docs. 66 , 67 , 77 ) on plaintiffs' First/Fourteenth Amendment claim (Count IV) be, and the same hereby are , granted. The motion for summary judgment of Officer Evilsizer on plaintiffs' Fourth/Fourteenth excessive use of force claim (Count I) be, and the same hereby is, denied. The motion for summary judgment of Officer Evilsizer on plaintiffs' Fourth/Fourteenth unlawful arrest and detention claim (Count III) be, and thesame hereby is, granted. The motions for summary judgment of Deputies Geiger and Lee, and Sergeant Hart (Docs. 67 , 77 ) on plaintiffs' Fourth/Fourteenth unlawful arrest and detention and excessive use of force claims (Counts I and III) be, and the same hereby are, denied. Judge James G. Carr on 9/22/15. (C,D)
|
|
Filing
42
Order. Defendants motions to dismiss (Docs. 30, 33, 34) granted with respect to plaintiffs claims in: a.) Count II (failure to intervene), as to all on scene officer movants, without prejudice; b.) Count V (conspiracy) as to all on scene off icer movants, without prejudice; c.) Counts VI and VII (state tort law claims) as to defendants Gatchel and Edelbrock with prejudice as to further proceedings in this court and case, and the other on scene movants without prejudice; and d.) Count VII I as to the supervisory defendants with prejudice as to derivative liability for the on scene actions of their subordinates and without prejudice as to claims of failure to train; and e.) As to the governmental entity defendants without prejudice. Defendants motions to dismiss be, and the same hereby otherwise are overruled. The Clerk shall schedule a status/scheduling conference, to be held forthwith. Judge James G. Carr on 2/10/2014.(G,D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
