Woodson v. Mohr et al
| La'Quan Woodson |
| Gary C. Mohr, Edward Shelton, G. Parker, S. Brown and Danhoff |
| 3:2014cv00076 |
| January 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Lucas |
| Jeffrey J. Helmick |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' unopposed motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 76) is granted. Defendants Parker, Sealscott, and the Toledo Correctional Institution are dismissed from this action. Defendant Parker's previously fil ed motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 38) is denied as moot. The remaining claims in this litigation are those asserted against Defendant Danhoff. A telephonic status conference is scheduled for August 24, 2016 at 10:30 AM and the Court will initiate that conference call. re 38 , 76 . Motions terminated: 38 , 76 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/12/2016. (SG,D)
|
|
Filing
33
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint is granted and the Clerk is instructed to file the amended complaint forthwith. In addition, Defendant Parker's motion to dismiss is denied. re 23 29 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/4/2015. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
7
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Due Process Claim under the Fourteenth Amendment is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Moreover, he has failed to state claims against defendants Gary Mohr, Edward Shelton, or S. Br own based on Excessive Force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and these defendants are dismissed from this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). As to his remaining Eighth Amendment claims against Parker and Danhoff, the Clerk's Of fice is directed to forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshal for service of process. The Clerk's Office shall include a copy of this order in the documents to be served upon the Defendants. I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 9/25/2014. (S,AL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
