Teagarden v. Coleman et al
| Trevor Teagarden |
| John Coleman, Kevin Jones, Gary Mohr, Gary Croft, Mona Parks, Tanya Wright, Stuart Hudson, Dr. Eddy, Lisa Peterson, Kristine Edwards, Carlos Perez, Thomas Lin, CNP Speelman, CO Olivo, CO Miller and John Doe 1-5 |
| 3:2014cv00647 |
| March 25, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Allen |
| Jeffrey J. Helmick |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
Order : the Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, (Doc. No. 15), is denied without prejudice and Teagarden's motion for appointment of counsel, (Doc. No. 24 and 27), are granted. Pursuant to General Order No. 2007-02 (See N.D. Ohio Local Rule, Appx. J), the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to appoint counsel for the plaintiff. (Related Doc # 15 )(Related Doc # 24 )(Related Doc # 27 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 1/5/2016.(S,AL)
|
Filing
22
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Teagarden's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 20), is denied, and his motion for an extension of time to respond to the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No . 21), is granted in part and denied in part.Teagarden shall have until December 21, 2015, to file his brief in opposition to the Defendants' motion to dismiss. Further extensions of this deadline will not be granted without good cause shown. Motions terminated: 20 , 21 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 10/26/2015. (SG,D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.