Rivers v. Turner et al
||Doylan V. Rivers
||Neil Turner, F.N.U. Hunt, F.N.U. Shaeffer, F.N.U. Starks, Jane Doe, F.N.U. Joyce and Norm Hills
||November 19, 2014
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||James R. Knepp
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 29, 2016
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Motions for Partial Summary Judgment Instanter (Docs. 65 , 77 ) are granted; Riversequal protection and First Amendment retaliation claims are dismissed. With no other federal claims remaining, this Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Rivers' state law deprivation-of-property claim. See United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726(1966) ([I]f the federal claims are dismissed before trial... the state claims should be dismissed aswell.). Rivers' Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 79 ) is denied as moot. Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/29/16. (C,D)
|September 15, 2015
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to dismiss 19 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. This action shall proceed on Rivers' First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Turner, Hills, Joyce, Starks and Institutional Inspector Jane Doe for Rivers' placement in administrative segregation, Rivers' Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claim against Defendants Turner, Hills, Joyce, and Shaeffer, and Rivers' state-law deprivation-of-property claim against Defendants Turner, Hills, Joyce, Starks, Institutional Inspector Jane Doe, Hunt and Shaeffer. Judge Jack Zouhary on 9/15/2015. (D,L)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?