Gerber v. Ohio Northern University
| Scott D. Gerber |
| Ohio Northern University, Stephen C. Veltri, David C. Crago, Richard A. Bales, Tonya Paul and John Doe |
| 3:2014cv02763 |
| March 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Hardin |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
Memorandum Opinion and Order. This Court finds Gerber did not prove his claim by a preponderance of the evidence. This class, and this case, is dismissed. See Opinion for details. Judge Jack Zouhary on 8/24/2016. (D,L)
|
|
Filing
97
Memorandum Opinion and Order re: Assault Claim Against ONU. ONU is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Gerber's negligent retention and supervision claim. The Motion 65 is granted. Judge Jack Zouhary on 12/17/2015. (D,L)
|
|
Filing
21
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss. This Court denies ONU's Motion to Dismiss 13 as to Counts V and VI, and denies Veltri's Motion to Dismiss 17 as to Counts II and III. This Co urt grants all other Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 14 , 15 , 16 ). Counts V and VI remain against ONU. Counts II and III remain against Veltri. All other counts and Defendants Crago, Bales, and Paul are dismissed. Gerber's Motions to strike are denied (see Doc. 20 at 21-22). Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/30/2015. (D,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
