Pulse et al v. Gale et al
| Karen Pulse and Paul Barnhart |
| Peter Gale, Keith Williams, Karen Volz, Roger Binnette, Adam West, Rob Bess, Lt. Lewis, Erie County Common Pleas Court, Erie County Adult Probation and Sandusky Police Department |
| 3:2016cv00091 |
| January 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Erie |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying as moot 18 Judge Binnette's First Motion to Dismiss and granting in part the Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 22 , 23 , 24]). Plaintiffs' claims against Volz, Binnette, the Erie County Common Pleas Court, the Erie County Adult Probation Department and the Sandusky Police Department are dismissed with prejudice. Their conspiracy claim under 18 U.S.C. §241, their claims under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, and Pulse's Eighth Amend ment claim are also dismissed with prejudice. At this time, the Court abstains from exercising its jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment claims against Gale, Williams, West, and Lewis, and stays this action until both the state court criminal proceedings against Barnhart have concluded. Defendants shall promptly advise this Court when the state proceedings are resolved. Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/27/2016. (D,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
